Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 11:34

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What are some ballbusting stories?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Taylor Swift Dance Wedding Video with Travis Kelce Reveals Unmatched Vibe - Athlon Sports
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Million-Dollar Project Aims to Expose Bad Medical Research - Gizmodo
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Do all rocket engines emit harmful gases into the atmosphere during launch?
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Derek Carr explains his decision to give up $30 million and retire - NBC Sports
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Astronomers discover most powerful cosmic explosions since the Big Bang - Live Science